[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Bug#666067: transition: libkpathsea6



Hi Adam,

On Tue, 03 Apr 2012 19:04:39 +0100, "Adam D. Barratt" wrote:

> On Fri, 2012-03-30 at 07:50 +0900, Atsuhito Kohda wrote:
>> On Thu, 29 Mar 2012 14:09:22 +0100, "Adam D. Barratt" wrote:
>> > There have been four build failures from the binNMUs so far - catdvi
>> > (#666169), dvi2dvi (#666172), ptex-bin (#666170), texfam (#666171).
> 
> Also #666293 (dvi2ps), which I missed before.

I remembered that dvi2ps caused problem when we upgraded
to kpathsea5.  
It looks the maintainer is not active recently but I found 
the upstream has released new version which is based on TL2009.
It is not based on TL2012 but it is much better and much easier 
to migrate to TL2012 than the current version.
Anyway, I'll contact the maintainer.

>> FYI.  ptex-bin is replaced with new TeXLive packages
>> and should be removed, at least, in a near future.
> 
> Okay.  We'll remove it from testing once everything else is ready then;
> I guess an RM request will appear for unstable in due course.

Norbert and all, I'm afraid we should prepare dummy packages
to make upgrade smoothly at some point.  
Is it TeXLive packages that build dummy packages? 
Of course I'll build dummy package of my packages if necessary.

>> texfam is (obsolete) japanese TeX system and it should
>> be removed if it failes to be compatible with libkpathse6.
>> I'm not sure if texfam could be compatible with libkpathsea6 
>> or not but I'll contact the maintainer about this issue
>> afterwards.
>> (BTW texfam might be programmed for libkpathsea3 or 4, IIRC)
> 
> Thanks.  Any news on that?

Yes, we've already communicated successfully and 
new beta version is released by the upstream.
But please wait.  I believe it might take more time.

Best regards,	    	     2012-4-4(Wed)

-- 
 Debian Developer - much more I18N of Debian
 Atsuhito Kohda <kohda AT debian.org>
 Department of Math., Univ. of Tokushima


Reply to: