[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#600339: please remove getnonfreefonts



On Tue, 20 Mar 2012 07:55:24 +0100
Thomas Weber <tweber@debian.org> wrote:

> On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 04:06:58PM +1100, Karl Goetz wrote:
> > On Mon, 19 Mar 2012 22:10:01 +0100
> > Thomas Weber <tweber@debian.org> wrote:
> > 
> > > On Sun, Oct 24, 2010 at 03:10:57PM +0200, Frank Küster wrote:
> > > > Karl Goetz <karl@kgoetz.id.au> wrote:
> > > > 
> > > > > Package: texlive-base-bin
> > > > > Version: all
> > > > > User: karl@kgoetz.id.au
> > > > > Usertags: libreplanet
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > I thought there was a bug on this, but i can't find it.
> > > > > The getnonfreefonts is only used for downloading proprietary
> > > > > software, so it should probably go in contrib rather then
> > > > > main.
> > > > 
> > > > If it were in a separate package, or at least a major part of
> > > > the package it is in, I'd agree with you.  But IMO it doesn't
> > > > make sense to split off a contrib package from texlive-base-bin
> > > > for one small script. And AFAIR, this is also consense in the
> > > > project - please correct me if I'm wrong.
> > 
> > I'm not aware of other package in main with similar downloading
> > scripts, perhaps I've missed something myself though.
> 
> If you take "scripts" in a somewhat broader context, the add-on
> mechanism of most browser qualifies.

The add on mechanism of browsers supports downloading free extensions
too. TTbOMK this script only downloads non-free/proprietary code.

> > > I'm closing this bug. The script itself is free software and
> > > creating a new package (or removing the script) is pretty much
> > > pointless.
> > 
> > While I won't try and change the but status, could I ask why you
> > think removing the script is pointless?
> 
> There are two possibilites:
> 1) Move the script into its own package in contrib.
> 2) Remove it entirely.
> 
> Looking at the age of the bug, it's pretty clear nobody is going to do
> either. And it is just a small part of a package, so the benefits
> simple outweigh the extra work.
> 
> The "right" way to go from here is trying to get the fonts free.
> Everything else is just beating around the bush.

That would be ideal, sadly it doesn't always work :(
thanks,
kk

-- 
Karl Goetz, (Kamping_Kaiser / VK7FOSS)
http://www.kgoetz.id.au
No, I won't join your social networking group
*** I've changed GPG key to 6C097260 ***

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: