[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#600339: marked as done (please remove getnonfreefonts)

Your message dated Mon, 19 Mar 2012 22:10:01 +0100
with message-id <20120319211001.GA26523@t61>
and subject line Re: Bug#600339: please remove getnonfreefonts
has caused the Debian Bug report #600339,
regarding please remove getnonfreefonts
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
600339: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=600339
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: texlive-base-bin
Version: all
User: karl@kgoetz.id.au
Usertags: libreplanet


I thought there was a bug on this, but i can't find it.
The getnonfreefonts is only used for downloading proprietary software,
so it should probably go in contrib rather then main.
thanks,
kk

-- 
Karl Goetz, (Kamping_Kaiser / VK5FOSS)
Debian contributor / gNewSense Maintainer
http://www.kgoetz.id.au
No, I won't join your social networking group

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
On Sun, Oct 24, 2010 at 03:10:57PM +0200, Frank Küster wrote:
> Karl Goetz <karl@kgoetz.id.au> wrote:
> 
> > Package: texlive-base-bin
> > Version: all
> > User: karl@kgoetz.id.au
> > Usertags: libreplanet
> >
> >
> > I thought there was a bug on this, but i can't find it.
> > The getnonfreefonts is only used for downloading proprietary software,
> > so it should probably go in contrib rather then main.
> 
> If it were in a separate package, or at least a major part of the
> package it is in, I'd agree with you.  But IMO it doesn't make sense to
> split off a contrib package from texlive-base-bin for one small
> script. And AFAIR, this is also consense in the project - please correct
> me if I'm wrong.

I'm closing this bug. The script itself is free software and creating a
new package (or removing the script) is pretty much pointless.

	Thomas

--- End Message ---
Reply to: