[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: RFS: bibtool



Hello:

Thanks for your comments.

On 26/01/12 11:31, Etienne Millon wrote:
Hello, I had a quick look at your package.

d/changelog:
  * New upstream version.
  * Several bugfixes in the upstream version (Closes: #535581).

You can probably merge those two ones (New upstream version (Closes:
#535581)).

done


d/changelog:
  * Close "crossref field does not force ordering" bug since this
    behaviour is a feature according to the upstream maintainer:
    comments were saved in README.Debian (Closes: #291134).
  * Close "Probably surplus warning message" bug because this
    behviour is actually managed according to the upstream
    maintainer: comments were saved in README.Debian (Closes: #187255).

I think that it's better not to unclutter README.Debian with this
information. Just send it to the BTS at the address nnn-done@b.d.o
(don't forget the version pseudoheader) is probably enough.

The added comments in README.Debian were removed,
and the debian/changelog was modified accordingly.

Otherwise, which legitimacy I have to send to the BTS.


d/rules:
The top comments are useless, you can remove them.

done


d/TODO should be removed too.


done: I will keep it on my box.

The debian/copyright was corrected as well:
lintian failed to detect non ASCII chars.


Have a nice day !


I have just uploaded the revisited version.

Jerome


Reply to: