Re: bibtool: kpathsea: HAVE_PROTOTYPES macro
Jerome BENOIT <g6299304p@rezozer.net> wrote:
> I have just gone through the debian/changelog : in 2006
>
> * Rebuild with new libkpathsea package
So that was with libkpathsea4, now we have libkpathsea5 for a while.
The new soname version is not completely "clean", but it is much better
than older versions.
>> You could ask upstream,
>
> In the bibtool, when a kpathsea header is included, HAVE_PROTOTYPE is defined
>
> but I fear in the end the most promising
>> approach is to test it...
>
> in the debian folder, there is a `stresstest' script: I guess it meant for that.
Is it of the same age as that test? Do you have an idea what "works
better" actually meant, can it be tested with that script?
> Will it hurt if it is let ?
Again, no idea.
Regards, Frank
--
Frank Küster
Sprecher B90/Grüne OV Miltenberg und Umgebung
VCD Miltenberg, ADFC Aschaffenburg-Miltenberg
Debian Developer (TeXLive)
Reply to: