Bug#631996: marked as done (texlive-binaries: \bf ignored for Japanese)
Your message dated Fri, 15 Jul 2011 10:11:26 +0900 (JST)
with message-id <20110715.101126.1931232704200309751.atsuhito@pm.tokushima-u.ac.jp>
and subject line Re: Bug#631996: texlive-binaries: \bf ignored for Japanese
has caused the Debian Bug report #631996,
regarding texlive-binaries: \bf ignored for Japanese
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
631996: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=631996
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
- To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
- Subject: texlive-binaries: \bf ignored for Japanese
- From: Ryo Furue <furue@hawaii.edu>
- Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2011 15:07:50 -1000 (HST)
- Message-id: <20110628.150750.268848445.furue@hawaii.edu>
Package: texlive-binaries
Version: 2009-8
Severity: normal
dvipdfmx doesn't use the Gothic font for \textbf{} or \gt .
$ cat tmp.tex
\documentclass{jarticle}
\begin{document}
こんにちは。\textbf{こんにちは。}{\bf こんにちは。}{\gt こんにちは。}
Hello.\textbf{Hello.}{\bf Hello.}{\gt Hello.}
\end{document}
$ platex tmp
$ dvipdfmx tmp
$ acroread tmp.pdf
The English alphabets are in bold face for \textbf and \bf
but all Japanese text is set in the Mincho font.
Ryo
-- System Information:
Debian Release: wheezy/sid
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.39-2-686-pae (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Versions of packages texlive-binaries depends on:
ii ed 1.4-3 The classic UNIX line editor
ii libc6 2.13-7 Embedded GNU C Library: Shared lib
ii libfontconfig1 2.8.0-2.2 generic font configuration library
ii libfreetype6 2.4.4-1 FreeType 2 font engine, shared lib
ii libgcc1 1:4.6.0-10 GCC support library
ii libkpathsea5 2009-8 TeX Live: path search library for
ii libncurses5 5.9-1 shared libraries for terminal hand
ii libpng12-0 1.2.44-2 PNG library - runtime
ii libpoppler5 0.12.4-1.2 PDF rendering library
ii libstdc++6 4.6.0-10 The GNU Standard C++ Library v3
ii libx11-6 2:1.4.3-2 X11 client-side library
ii libxaw7 2:1.0.9-2 X11 Athena Widget library
ii libxmu6 2:1.1.0-2 X11 miscellaneous utility library
ii libxpm4 1:3.5.9-1 X11 pixmap library
ii libxt6 1:1.1.1-2 X11 toolkit intrinsics library
ii perl 5.12.3-7+b1 Larry Wall's Practical Extraction
ii tex-common 2.09 common infrastructure for building
ii texlive-common 2009-11 TeX Live: Base component
ii zlib1g 1:1.2.3.4.dfsg-3 compression library - runtime
texlive-binaries recommends no packages.
texlive-binaries suggests no packages.
-- no debconf information
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Hi Furue-san,
On Thu, 14 Jul 2011 14:28:54 -1000 (HST), Ryo Furue wrote:
> Who would've thought that the Adobe Reader doesn't have
> a Gothic font?!?! Do you know the reason? Has this
> issue been reported to Adobe? Or is it deliberate?
I don't know the reason but I believe it is not deliberate.
I heard Windows version of acroread has Gothic font but
Linux version doesn't. (I rarely use Windows so don't know
precisely.)
I rememberd that someone reported this issue to Adobe
(several years ago?) and Adobe fixed it at that time but
in the next version Adobe forgot to provide Gothic font again
as far as I know.
> Thank you again for your help with this issue,
> which is NOT directly related to TeX!
Okay, so closing the bug.
Regards, 2011-7-15(Fri)
--
Debian Developer - much more I18N of Debian
Atsuhito Kohda <kohda AT debian.org>
Department of Math., Univ. of Tokushima
--- End Message ---
Reply to: