--- Begin Message ---
- To: Atsuhito Kohda <kohda@pm.tokushima-u.ac.jp>, 338608-done@bugs.debian.org
- Subject: Re: Bug#338608: please remove the "initex" from TeXs man page
- From: Hilmar Preusse <hille42@web.de>
- Date: Tue, 8 Mar 2011 19:08:58 +0100
- Message-id: <20110308180858.GA9325@preusse-16223.user.cis.dfn.de>
- In-reply-to: <20051111.234848.74735029.kohda@pm.tokushima-u.ac.jp>
- References: <20051111140111.GB2412@preusse> <20051111.234848.74735029.kohda@pm.tokushima-u.ac.jp>
On 11.11.05 Atsuhito Kohda (kohda@pm.tokushima-u.ac.jp) wrote:
Hi Atsuhito,
> From: Hilmar Preusse <hille42@web.de>
> Subject: Bug#338608: please remove the "initex" from TeXs man page
> Date: Fri, 11 Nov 2005 15:01:11 +0100
>
> > The man page page of TeX still refers to a program called initex,
> > which has been removed from teTeX (was a only link to /usr/bin/tex
> > anyway). Please clean up the man page.
>
> No, I don't think so. Okay, let's see what manual of TeX
> said to us;
>
> This version of TeX looks at its command line to see what name it was
> called under. If they exist, then both initex and virtex are symbolic
> links to the tex executable. When called as initex (or when the -ini
> option is given) it can be used to precompile macros into a .fmt file.
>
> The above statement is perfectly true whether or not teTeX
> (or we) provides a symbolic link initex to tex. On the contrary,
> I think if manual of TeX doesn't refer to this feature of TeX,
> then it is certainly the gave bug of manual page.
>
OK, closing.
H.
--
sigmentation fault
--- End Message ---