[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#608469: tex-common: Path of texmf trees hard coded in postinst scripts



Package: tex-common
Version: 2.08
Severity: wishlist

In the file /etc/texmf/texmf.cnf it is possible to change the values of
TEXMFMAIN, TEXMFDIST, TEXMFSYSVAR .  However these settings are ignored in
the postinst scripts of tex-common (and maybe other packages), simply the
default values are assumed.  The scripts should source
/etc/texmf/texmf.cnf (if it exists) and assume the default values only the
the necessary variables are empty after sourcing the file.

H.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 6.0
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.32-5-686 (SMP w/1 CPU core)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) (ignored: LC_ALL set to en_GB.UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash

Versions of packages tex-common depends on:
ii  debconf [debconf-2.0]        1.5.37      Debian configuration management sy
ii  dpkg                         1.15.8.7    Debian package management system
ii  ucf                          3.0025+nmu1 Update Configuration File: preserv

tex-common recommends no packages.

Versions of packages tex-common suggests:
ii  debhelper                     8.0.0      helper programs for debian/rules

Versions of packages texlive-base depends on:
ii  dpkg                      1.15.8.7       Debian package management system
ii  install-info              4.13a.dfsg.1-6 Manage installed documentation in 
ii  luatex                    0.65.0-1       next generation TeX engine
ii  mime-support              3.51-1         MIME files 'mime.types' & 'mailcap
ii  texlive-binaries          2009-8         Binaries for TeX Live
ii  texlive-common            2009-11        TeX Live: Base component
ii  texlive-doc-base          2009-2         TeX Live: TeX Live documentation

-- debconf information:
  tex-common/check_texmf_wrong:
  tex-common/check_texmf_missing:



Reply to: