On Sun, Dec 26, 2010 at 08:10:34PM +0200, أحمد المحمودي wrote:
> From the build log[3], I think that the hack seems to build luatex statically:
---end quoted text---
Btw, I ran a debdiff between Ubuntu's builds of luatex (with &
without the patch) on i386:
$ debdiff luatex_0.65.0-1_i386.deb luatex_0.65.0-1ubuntu1_i386.deb
File lists identical (after any substitutions)
Control files: lines which differ (wdiff format)
------------------------------------------------
Depends: libc6 (>= 2.11), {+libgcc1 (>= 1:4.1.1),+} libpng12-0 (>= 1.2.13-4), libpoppler7, {+libstdc++6 (>= 4.1.1),+} zlib1g (>= 1:1.1.4)
Installed-Size: [-4532-] {+4456+}
Version: [-0.65.0-1-] {+0.65.0-1ubuntu1+}
--
أحمد المحمودي (Ahmed El-Mahmoudy)
Digital design engineer
GPG KeyID: 0xEDDDA1B7
GPG Fingerprint: 8206 A196 2084 7E6D 0DF8 B176 BC19 6A94 EDDD A1B7
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature