Bug#76671: marked as done (inadequate specification of texlinks)
Your message dated Sun, 05 Dec 2010 07:56:03 +0900 (JST)
with message-id <20101205.075603.193720798.kohda@pm.tokushima-u.ac.jp>
and subject line Re: Bug#76671: #76671 inadequate specification of texlinks
has caused the Debian Bug report #76671,
regarding inadequate specification of texlinks
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
76671: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=76671
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: tetex-bin
Version: 1.0.7+20000807
Severity: wishlist
fmtutil and texlinks seem to cooperate with each other
but I noticed that
- fmtutil can create *.fmt selectively with --byformat
even if "cnffile" contains many entries,
but on the other hand
- texlinks create every links for the entries listed in
"cnffile"
I think texlinks should be able to create links selectively
like 'texlinks --byname alatex blatex' which would create
links tex->alatex, tex->blatex.
How do you think?
Best Regards, 2000.11.10
--
Debian JP Developer - much more I18N of Debian
Atsuhito Kohda <kohda@pm.tokushima-u.ac.jp>
Department of Math., Tokushima Univ.
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Hi Hilmar,
On Sat, 4 Dec 2010 22:27:41 +0100, Hilmar Preusse wrote:
> If you just want to add one symlink, why use texlinks?
> ln -s foo baa
> will do the trick.
>
> On the other hand, what is the problem if texlinks recreates the
> existing links?
> <snap>
>
> Should we continue working on this iussue and forward it to new
> upstream? At least the request has not been implemented AFAICT.
I almost completely forgot what I wanted in that old time.
I guess perhaps I thought about handling of some pTeX related
formats or something.
But now pTeX is included in TeXLive 2010 so I don't see any
problem so I close this.
Thanks for your kind information.
Regards, 2010-12-5(Sun)
--
Debian Developer - much more I18N of Debian
Atsuhito Kohda <kohda AT debian.org>
Department of Math., Univ. of Tokushima
--- End Message ---
Reply to: