Re: Bug#481491: debian-policy: please add LPPL v1.3a to Policy
- To: 481491@bugs.debian.org
- Cc: debian-tex-maint@lists.debian.org
- Subject: Re: Bug#481491: debian-policy: please add LPPL v1.3a to Policy
- From: Russ Allbery <rra@debian.org>
- Date: Sat, 17 Jul 2010 18:19:47 -0700
- Message-id: <[🔎] 87aappfux8.fsf@windlord.stanford.edu>
- In-reply-to: <87vd9qmxxi.fsf@windlord.stanford.edu> (Russ Allbery's message of "Thu, 10 Jun 2010 13:31:53 -0700")
- References: <20080516131955.GA11239@preusse-16223.user.cis.dfn.de> <20080516135227.GA12283@pcbcn10.phys.rug.nl> <20080516145001.GA4000@PC23> <87hccyyzrx.fsf@windlord.stanford.edu> <87vd9qmxxi.fsf@windlord.stanford.edu>
Russ Allbery <rra@debian.org> writes:
> Given these facts, I'm personally currently leaning against including
> this license in common-licenses, but I'm still open to being convinced,
> particularly if you think that a broader search for more versions of the
> license will turn up another significant cluster of packages.
Subsequent discussion was only negative on including the license, so I'm
marking this bug as rejected. It will be left open for a time in case
anyone wants to reopen the discussion.
--
Russ Allbery (rra@debian.org) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/>
Reply to: