[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#536427: marked as done (fancyvbr.sty depends on ragged2e.sty from texlive-latex-extra)

Your message dated Mon, 21 Jun 2010 13:54:33 +0200
with message-id <20100621115433.GA5624@PC23>
and subject line Re: Bug#536427: fancyvbr.sty depends on ragged2e.sty from texlive-latex-extra
has caused the Debian Bug report #536427,
regarding fancyvbr.sty depends on ragged2e.sty from texlive-latex-extra
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
536427: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=536427
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: texlive-latex-recommended
Version: 2007.dfsg.2-4
Severity: normal

fancyvrb.sty depends on ragged2e.sty, which is in texlive-latex-extra.
I guess you don't want to depend on the -extra package, so please move
fancyvrb,sty to -extra.


 | 
 | ! LaTeX Error: File `ragged2e.sty' not found.
 | 
 | Type X to quit or <RETURN> to proceed,
 | or enter new name. (Default extension: sty)
 | 
 | Enter file name: 
 | ! Emergency stop.
 | <read *> 
 |          
 | l.70 \usepackage
 |                 {fancyvrb}^^M
 | !  ==> Fatal error occurred, no output PDF file produced!
 | 


-- System Information:
Debian Release: squeeze/sid
  APT prefers oldstable
  APT policy: (500, 'oldstable'), (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.23.1 (PREEMPT)
Locale: LANG=en_GB.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash

Versions of packages texlive-latex-recommended depends on:
ii  dpkg                       1.15.2        Debian package management system
ii  tex-common                 1.20          common infrastructure for building
ii  texlive-common             2007.dfsg.2-4 TeX Live: Base component
ii  texlive-latex-base         2007.dfsg.2-4 TeX Live: Basic LaTeX packages

Versions of packages texlive-latex-recommended recommends:
pn  latex-beamer               <none>        (no description available)
pn  latex-xcolor               <none>        (no description available)
pn  prosper                    <none>        (no description available)
ii  texlive-latex-recommended- 2007.dfsg.2-4 TeX Live: Documentation files for 

texlive-latex-recommended suggests no packages.

Versions of packages tex-common depends on:
ii  debconf [debconf-2.0]         1.5.26     Debian configuration management sy
ii  dpkg                          1.15.2     Debian package management system
ii  ucf                           3.0018     Update Configuration File: preserv

Versions of packages texlive-latex-recommended is related to:
pn  tetex-base                    <none>     (no description available)
pn  tetex-bin                     <none>     (no description available)
pn  tetex-extra                   <none>     (no description available)
ii  tex-common                    1.20       common infrastructure for building

-- debconf information excluded

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
Version: 2009-1

On 09.07.09 Bas Zoetekouw (bas@debian.org) wrote:

> Package: texlive-latex-recommended
> Version: 2007.dfsg.2-4
> Severity: normal
> 
> fancyvrb.sty depends on ragged2e.sty, which is in texlive-latex-extra.
> I guess you don't want to depend on the -extra package, so please move
> fancyvrb,sty to -extra.
> 
In TL2009 it was made the other way: ragged2e.sty is in
texlive-latex-recommended.

hille@sid:~ $ dlocate ragged2e
texlive-latex-recommended: /usr/share/texmf-texlive/tex/latex/ms/ragged2e.sty
texlive-xetex: /usr/share/texmf-texlive/tex/xelatex/bidi/ragged2e-bidi.def

-> Closing.

H.
-- 
sigmentation fault

--- End Message ---
Reply to: