Package: texlive-binaries Version: 2009-5 Severity: normal File: /usr/bin/mpost I'm not that familiar with Metapost, so I was confused by the errors I got when I ran it: it was looking for mpost.mp, or failing that, plain.mp, and didn't have them. Installing texlive-metapost made it work. Should mpost.mp and plain.mp move to texlive-binaries, or should mpost move to texlive-metapost, or should texlive-binaries depend on or recommend texlive-metapost, or something else? -- System Information: Debian Release: squeeze/sid APT prefers testing APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 2.6.32 (SMP w/2 CPU cores; PREEMPT) Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Versions of packages texlive-binaries depends on: ii libc6 2.10.2-6 Embedded GNU C Library: Shared lib ii libfontconfig1 2.8.0-2 generic font configuration library ii libfreetype6 2.3.11-1 FreeType 2 font engine, shared lib ii libgcc1 1:4.4.2-9 GCC support library ii libkpathsea5 2009-5 TeX Live: path search library for ii libncurses5 5.7+20100313-1 shared libraries for terminal hand ii libpng12-0 1.2.43-1 PNG library - runtime ii libpoppler5 0.12.2-2 PDF rendering library ii libstdc++6 4.4.2-9 The GNU Standard C++ Library v3 ii libx11-6 2:1.3.3-2 X11 client-side library ii libxaw7 2:1.0.7-1 X11 Athena Widget library ii libxmu6 2:1.0.5-1 X11 miscellaneous utility library ii libxpm4 1:3.5.8-1 X11 pixmap library ii libxt6 1:1.0.7-1 X11 toolkit intrinsics library ii tex-common 2.07 common infrastructure for building ii zlib1g 1:1.2.3.4.dfsg-3 compression library - runtime texlive-binaries recommends no packages. texlive-binaries suggests no packages. -- no debconf information
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature