[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Processed (with 1 errors): Re: Bug#560885: texlive-base: Fails to upgrade



Processing commands for control@bugs.debian.org:

> reassign 560885 texlive-binaries
Bug #560885 [texlive-base] texlive-base: Fails to upgrade
Bug reassigned from package 'texlive-base' to 'texlive-binaries'.
Bug No longer marked as found in versions texlive-base/2009-4.
> reassign 560854 texlive-binaries
Bug #560854 {Done: Norbert Preining <preining@debian.org>} [tex-common] tex-common: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1 - fmtutil-sys failed
Bug reassigned from package 'tex-common' to 'texlive-binaries'.
Bug No longer marked as found in versions tex-common/2.02.
Bug No longer marked as fixed in versions tex-common/2.03.
> severity 560854 important
Bug #560854 {Done: Norbert Preining <preining@debian.org>} [texlive-binaries] tex-common: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1 - fmtutil-sys failed
Ignoring request to change severity of Bug 560854 to the same value.
> severity 560885 important
Bug #560885 [texlive-binaries] texlive-base: Fails to upgrade
Severity set to 'important' from 'serious'

> severity 557091 important
Bug #557091 {Done: Norbert Preining <preining@debian.org>} [texlive-binaries] texlive-binaries: fmtutil-sys failed during upgrade from texlive 2007
Ignoring request to change severity of Bug 557091 to the same value.
> merge 557091 560885 560854
Bug#557091: texlive-binaries: fmtutil-sys failed during upgrade from texlive 2007
Bug#560854: tex-common: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1 - fmtutil-sys failed
Bug#560885: texlive-base: Fails to upgrade
Mismatch - only Bugs in same state can be merged:
Values for `done mark' don't match:
 #557091 has `done';
 #560885 has `open'

> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


Reply to: