[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#557647: marked as done (luatex >=0.44 doesn't provide texdoc anymore but diversion is not reverted)

Your message dated Thu, 03 Dec 2009 09:41:44 +0000
with message-id <E1NG8C0-0007LA-HB@ries.debian.org>
and subject line Bug#557647: fixed in luatex 0.46.0-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #557647,
regarding luatex >=0.44 doesn't provide texdoc anymore but diversion is not reverted
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
557647: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=557647
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: luatex
Version: 0.44.0-2
Severity: normal

Hi!

It seems that luatex provided a replacement for texdoc in the
texlive-base package, and installed a diversion
texdoc->texdoc.notluatex.

During the transition to texlive2009 and the upgrade of luatex 0.40.6 ->
0.44.0, the diversion has not been reverted. Therefore I don't have any
binary /usr/bin/texdoc any more.

$ dpkg-divert --list | grep texdoc
diversion of /usr/bin/texdoc to /usr/bin/texdoc.notluatex by luatex
diversion of /usr/share/man/man1/texdoc.1.gz to /usr/share/man/man1/texdoc.notluatex.1.gz by luatex


Would it be possible to ensure that the diversion is reverted upon
upgrade?

Best regards,

	Cédric



-- System Information:
Debian Release: squeeze/sid
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (990, 'unstable'), (700, 'testing'), (600, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.31-1-686 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash

Versions of packages luatex depends on:
ii  libc6                  2.10.1-7          GNU C Library: Shared libraries
ii  libpng12-0             1.2.40-1          PNG library - runtime
ii  libpoppler5            0.12.0-2.1        PDF rendering library
ii  zlib1g                 1:1.2.3.3.dfsg-15 compression library - runtime

Versions of packages luatex recommends:
ii  texlive-luatex                2009-2     TeX Live: LuaTeX packages

luatex suggests no packages.

-- no debconf information

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
Source: luatex
Source-Version: 0.46.0-3

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
luatex, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

luatex_0.46.0-3.diff.gz
  to main/l/luatex/luatex_0.46.0-3.diff.gz
luatex_0.46.0-3.dsc
  to main/l/luatex/luatex_0.46.0-3.dsc
luatex_0.46.0-3_amd64.deb
  to main/l/luatex/luatex_0.46.0-3_amd64.deb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 557647@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Norbert Preining <preining@debian.org> (supplier of updated luatex package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmaster@debian.org)


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.8
Date: Thu, 03 Dec 2009 16:45:14 +0900
Source: luatex
Binary: luatex
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 0.46.0-3
Distribution: experimental
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian TeX Maintainers <debian-tex-maint@lists.debian.org>
Changed-By: Norbert Preining <preining@debian.org>
Description: 
 luatex     - next generation TeX engine
Closes: 557647
Changes: 
 luatex (0.46.0-3) experimental; urgency=low
 .
   * add code to postinstall to clean up the diversion mess in case the
     upgrade didn't do it properly (Closes: #557647)
Checksums-Sha1: 
 fdbb10c5a8324e20ffb59c2332733d69d73a10f3 1313 luatex_0.46.0-3.dsc
 925328d2f750e58432aa6b778a2ce8f4910ca413 46531 luatex_0.46.0-3.diff.gz
 cb80bb73d31689ebba7e305bce6f947aecffd009 2322240 luatex_0.46.0-3_amd64.deb
Checksums-Sha256: 
 6fa7f47ddf1a95c5e00a952f2a30a4837145ea95bbcb4a8b2a7d15ee1c709461 1313 luatex_0.46.0-3.dsc
 a001c15015faec13c2e99c1e2a0a441f2727ed1d8d833637bd002286a1c576e3 46531 luatex_0.46.0-3.diff.gz
 7845249ae0849db2c06ba6d38944ba04683456b652e70e5b022a6448070bf418 2322240 luatex_0.46.0-3_amd64.deb
Files: 
 bbbdec242a0f9dad5bf644815afa3094 1313 tex optional luatex_0.46.0-3.dsc
 c05402f38303782f61a6820e079cc433 46531 tex optional luatex_0.46.0-3.diff.gz
 a2afd3bbad0bc52d1c38e4046004d224 2322240 tex optional luatex_0.46.0-3_amd64.deb

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFLF26z0r9KownFsJQRAgSKAKCNDKIVFZ2ZkyIcZgNc6YCqReKd+QCfTJ5q
DHZTFWmRiPJh+zbt3IFd4f4=
=CskF
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--- End Message ---
Reply to: