[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#559120: marked as done (texlive-binaries: upgrade failure from texlive 2007)

Your message dated Wed, 02 Dec 2009 14:53:03 +0100
with message-id <20091202145303.89126ujn6du1itz3@webdesk.duckcorp.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#559120: texlive-binaries: upgrade failure from texlive 2007
has caused the Debian Bug report #559120,
regarding texlive-binaries: upgrade failure from texlive 2007
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
559120: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=559120
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: texlive-binaries
Version: 2009-1
Severity: normal

Coin,

Upgrading texlive from 2007 to 2009 in experimental gave:
Unpacking texlive-binaries (from .../texlive-binaries_2009-1_i386.deb) ...
dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/texlive-binaries_2009-1_i386.deb (--unpack): trying to overwrite '/usr/bin/disdvi', which is also in package dvi2tty 0:5.3.1-4 

Seems it should Conflicts/Replaces dvi2tty.

I guess i should still apply to 2009-3 too (reporting with a slight delay).

Regards.

--
Marc Dequènes (Duck)

Attachment: pgplea0pMesgq.pgp
Description: PGP Digital Signature


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
Coin,

Quoting Norbert Preining <preining@logic.at>:


No, dvi2ttty is only present in etch which is old-stable. We don't carry
any references to that old packgaes.

Why do you have still dvi2tty installed?


Why ? How should i know ?
I guess it should have been removed when apt is able to remove useless dependencies, or with a deborphan detection and manual removal, but it wasn't. I personnaly didn't ask for it for sure. 


Closing this bug.


As you wish...

--
Marc Dequènes (Duck)

Attachment: pgpOs5eNCLvdv.pgp
Description: PGP Digital Signature


--- End Message ---
Reply to: