Le mardi 01 décembre 2009, Norbert Preining a écrit : > On Di, 01 Dez 2009, Tanguy Ortolo wrote: > > information. There are these 6 characters in debian/control, “>= 0.8”, > > that providea wrong information. Replacing them by these seven > > characters, “>= 0.10”, does provide the right information. > > No, you are wrong, because popller will change the API again (as you > can easily see from the amount of patches and changes), and then > >= 0.10 is not enough, because we would need << 0.10.1, too. > > Can you provide that? No, becasue AFAIR (but I might be wrong here) > this is not supported. Is it not? I thought I saw it somewhere, for other packages. Anyway. > > - makes backporting harder, > > Wrong, it make backporting *easier, you need only change > debian/patches/series My apologies, I did not know that Poppler API and patch issue. The only thing I saw is a source packages that did not compile although I had the necessary dependencies installed. So there is a good reason for that. Again, sorry if I did not see it, my report was pointless. Sorry for the time it took you, too. > > - makes “funny builds on stable systems” harder; > > Well, that is what the package for stable is for ... Yes, but luatex's experimental version is needed as a dependency of texlive 2009. Anyway, I am playing too much between stable and unstable, that is my fault. > I prefer investing my time in tracking time real bugs, not useless > bug that only occur if someone builds a package for a wrong distribtuion. No problem, I shall not reopen it now I know the reason of that strange Build-Depend. -- Tanguy Ortolo
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature