Re: Bug#556784: RM: etoolbox -- ROM; provided by TexLive 2009
On Mi, 18 Nov 2009, Jan Hauke Rahm wrote:
> Why would etoolbox be uninstallable? It remains in (usable) in unstable
Ah rubbish, sorry, it was biblatex which is uninstallable.
> None of them are broken, and etoolbox isn't really of use to anyone for
> that matter. We just pushed it into the archive to have the docs of
apt-cache show biblatex gives me
Depends: ... texlive-latex-extra (>= 2009) ...
so it is not installable in unstable. That is what I wanted to say.
So the correct thing would have been to ask for uploading biblatex
to experimental as I did with lmodern. biblatex is *not*
installable.
Best wishes
Norbert
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Dr. Norbert Preining Associate Professor
JAIST Japan Advanced Institute of Science and Technology preining@jaist.ac.jp
Vienna University of Technology preining@logic.at
Debian Developer (Debian TeX Task Force) preining@debian.org
gpg DSA: 0x09C5B094 fp: 14DF 2E6C 0307 BE6D AD76 A9C0 D2BF 4AA3 09C5 B094
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SHENANDOAH (n.)
The infinite smugness of one who knows they are entitled to a place in
a nuclear bunker.
--- Douglas Adams, The Meaning of Liff
Reply to: