[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: What the hell: Re: texlive-bin_2009-1_amd64.changes REJECTED



Norbert Preining <preining@logic.at> wrote:

> On Fri, 13 Nov 2009, Norbert Preining wrote:
>> > Reject Reasons:
>> > texlive-binaries: lintian output: 'binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath ./usr/bin/afm2pl /tmp/texlive-bin-2009/inst/lib', automatically rejected package.
>
> BTW, from the wiki page about that:
>
> /-----------
> | While there's no policy dictating the accepted use of RPATH, it's been
> | a general consensus that RPATH use is discouraged, given the interactions
> | between the above reasons and Debian's way of dealing with libraries and
> | package dependencies.
> \----------

Although you have to admit that an RPATH of
/tmp/texlive-bin-2009/inst/lib/ *is* a bug...


This autoreject for non-critical bugs is more than a nuisance.

Regards, Frank
-- 
Dr. Frank Küster
Debian Developer (TeXLive)
VCD Aschaffenburg-Miltenberg, ADFC Miltenberg
B90/Grüne KV Miltenberg


Reply to: