[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#62859: Bug#210450: marked as done (Please provide template for removed non-free documentation)



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256


Hilmar Preusse wrote:
> On 24.08.09 Debian Bug Tracking System (owner@bugs.debian.org) wrote:
> 
> Hi Marco,
> 
>> To: 210450-done@bugs.debian.org
>> Subject: Package tetex-doc has been removed from Debian
>> Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2009 11:00:55 +0100
>> Message-Id: <1251108055.954266.4263.nullmailer@kmos.homeip.net>
>>
>> Version: 3.0.dfsg.3-5+rm
>>
>> You filled the bug http://bugs.debian.org/210450 in Debian BTS
>> against the package tetex-doc. I'm closing it at *unstable*, but it will
>> remain open for older distributions.
>>
>> For more information about this package's removal, read
>> http://bugs.debian.org/472810. That bug might give the reasons why
>> this package was removed and suggestions of possible replacements.
>>
>> Don't hesitate to reply to this mail if you have any question.
>>
>> Thank you for your contribution to Debian.
>>
> Are you sure the bug is fixed in TL? I guess many bugs applying to
> the old teTeX packages still apply to TL. We just didn't find the
> time to close the outdated bugs and reassign these whiche still
> apply. So please stop closing the bugs just b/c the package has been
> removed.

Hi!

I'm closing them versioned in unstable, so they will remain open for older
Debian distributions, such oldstable, old and stable, so anyone in the team
can handle them and do whatever they want, they just don't disappear.
Most of the maintainers forget to move their bugs to new packages or to close
them, so Debian QA needs to clean them out of BTS and if someone don't agree,
just feel free to reopen the bug and reassign it to the correct package.

I've reassigned this tetex-doc bug to texlive-base, so someone on the team can
handle it better than me. Each Debian Developer has his own ideas, and some of them
don't want old packages bugs in the new ones, so there is no policy to follow about
this procedure :(

Thank you

- --
Marco Rodrigues

http://Marco.Tondela.org

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
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=+TDW
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



Reply to: