[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#272334: marked as done (please consider delivering docs as .tex files as well for better searchability)

Your message dated Mon, 24 Aug 2009 11:00:55 +0100
with message-id <1251108055.907081.4261.nullmailer@kmos.homeip.net>
and subject line Package tetex-doc has been removed from Debian
has caused the Debian Bug report #272334,
regarding please consider delivering docs as .tex files as well for better searchability
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
272334: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=272334
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: tetex-doc
Version: 2.0.2b-4
Severity: wishlist

Hi,

some of the docs, for example scrguide, are only delivered in the
binary package as dvi and pdf file. This makes it hard to grep the
docs for specific bits of information.

Please consider delivering the .tex source code as well.

Greetings
Marc

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.8.1-janeway
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=de_DE

Versions of packages tetex-doc depends on:
ii  dpkg                          1.10.23    Package maintenance system for Deb
ii  tetex-base                    2.0.2b-4   Basic library files of teTeX

-- no debconf information

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
Version: 3.0.dfsg.3-5+rm

You filled the bug http://bugs.debian.org/272334 in Debian BTS
against the package tetex-doc. I'm closing it at *unstable*, but it will
remain open for older distributions.

For more information about this package's removal, read
http://bugs.debian.org/472810. That bug might give the reasons why
this package was removed and suggestions of possible replacements.

Don't hesitate to reply to this mail if you have any question.

Thank you for your contribution to Debian.

--
Marco Rodrigues

--- End Message ---
Reply to: