[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#122635: marked as done (Unclear documentation of rotating.sty)

Your message dated Mon, 24 Aug 2009 11:00:55 +0100
with message-id <1251108055.863361.4259.nullmailer@kmos.homeip.net>
and subject line Package tetex-doc has been removed from Debian
has caused the Debian Bug report #122635,
regarding Unclear documentation of rotating.sty
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
122635: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=122635
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: tetex-extra
Version: 1.0.2+20011202-1
Severity: normal

The rotating.sty package fails to work as documented (rotations do not occur).
The example provided by tetex-doc in /usr/share/doc/texmf/latex/rotating/examples.tex.gz also fails to produce a correct document.

-- System Information
Debian Release: 3.0
Kernel Version: Linux sodium 2.4.16 #1 Mon Dec 3 23:31:08 EST 2001 i686 unknown

Versions of the packages tetex-extra depends on:
ii  dpkg           1.9.18         Package maintenance system for Debian
ii  gsfonts        6.0-2          Fonts for the ghostscript interpreter
ii  tetex-base     1.0.2+20011202 basic teTeX library files
ii  tetex-bin      1.0.7+20001218 teTeX binary files

Attachment: pgpFS6nuBBdwL.pgp
Description: PGP signature


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
Version: 3.0.dfsg.3-5+rm

You filled the bug http://bugs.debian.org/122635 in Debian BTS
against the package tetex-doc. I'm closing it at *unstable*, but it will
remain open for older distributions.

For more information about this package's removal, read
http://bugs.debian.org/472810. That bug might give the reasons why
this package was removed and suggestions of possible replacements.

Don't hesitate to reply to this mail if you have any question.

Thank you for your contribution to Debian.

--
Marco Rodrigues

--- End Message ---
Reply to: