Re: Processed (with 1 errors): bug house keeping
Norbert Preining <preining@logic.at> wrote:
> On Mi, 10 Jun 2009, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
>> > merge 531595 531569
>> Bug#531569: The five years old bug...
>> Bug#531595: texlive-latex-base: Package fails to install in etch
>> Mismatch - only Bugs in same state can be merged:
>> Values for `package' don't match:
>> #531569 has `tetex-bin';
>> #531595 has `texlive-base-bin'
>
> Yup, anyone having an idea? Should we leave that bug assigned to
> tetex-bin because in old-stable there is actually a bug in tetex-bin,
> while now that is all in texlive-base-bin?
If we fix texlive in oldstable, it's probably not too hard to fix
tetex-bin, too. And I'm not sure ATM whether there were still packages
build-depending on tetex-bin in oldstable - so we'd better do that.
> I leave them separate for now and close both in the texlive-bin package.
> But aehm, that doesn't work, because tetex-bin is build grom
> texlive-base.
>
> Bummer. Suggestions?
I'll try to provide a patch for tetex-bin's fmtutil today.
Regards, Frank
--
Dr. Frank Küster
Debian Developer (TeXLive)
VCD Aschaffenburg-Miltenberg, ADFC Miltenberg
B90/Grüne KV Miltenberg
Reply to: