Re: removal of tetex-doc-nonfree?

[Hilmar Preusse <hille42@web.de>]

On 13.05.08 Norbert Preining (preining@logic.at) wrote:
> On Mo, 24 Dez 2007, Hilmar Preusse wrote:

Hi,


> > 1. create a new package tex-doc-nonfree, which contains the docs in
> >    question and provides the old package tetex-doc-nonfree.
> > 2. file a wishlist bug against beamer to take over its stuff
> > 3. care about remaining deps for tetex-doc-nonfree and file bugs
> >    against the packages in question.
> 
> Good idea. I have a never finished packages texlive-doc-nonfree in
> the attic, so something like this would be nice
> (fontinstallationguide eg, but many more ...)
> 
I again had a look at the package. It contains:

1. the outdated context docu
2. two beamer examples (one source code is LPPL, the other has no
   license, the pdfs may contain non-free fonts)
3. the fontinstallationguide being identical to this one in
   texlive-doc-en (is this a problem?)

I suggest to completely remove the package, cause I don't want to
keep it for the fontinstallationguide and two beamer exmaples

apt-rdepends show no package depending on tetex-doc-nonfree, I plan
to file the bug against ftp.debian.org on in about a week.

H.
-- 
To the systems programmer, users and applications serve only to provide a
test load.
  http://www.hilmar-preusse.de.vu/