Bug#515051: marked as done (texlive-pstricks: relax dependency on texlive-pstricks-doc?)
Your message dated Fri, 20 Feb 2009 23:49:34 +0100
with message-id <8b2d7b4d0902201449s7f135d2ch39bd99e7554f8a83@mail.gmail.com>
and subject line Re: Bug#515051: texlive-pstricks: relax dependency on texlive-pstricks-doc?
has caused the Debian Bug report #515051,
regarding texlive-pstricks: relax dependency on texlive-pstricks-doc?
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
515051: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=515051
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: texlive-pstricks
Version: 2007.dfsg.15-1
Severity: minor
Hello,
the situation as of now is:
$ aptitude why texlive-pstricks-doc
i texlive-pstricks Recommends texlive-pstricks-doc
Since Recommends are installed automatically I'd suggest to downgrade the
relation to a Suggest (so we can avoid to download >20Mb package we might not
need).
Thanks,
Sandro
-- Package-specific info:
If you report an error when running one of the TeX-related binaries
(latex, pdftex, metafont,...), or if the bug is related to bad or wrong
output, please include a MINIMAL example input file that produces the
error in your report. Don't forget to also include minimal examples of
other files that are needed, e.g. bibtex databases. Often it also helps
to include the logfile. Please, never send included pictures!
If your example file isn't short or produces more than one page of
output (except when multiple pages are needed to show the problem),
you can probably minimize it further. Instructions on how to do that
can be found at
http://www.latex-einfuehrung.de/mini-en.html (english)
or
http://www.latex-einfuehrung.de/mini.html (german)
##################################
minimal input file
##################################
other files
######################################
List of ls-R files
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 992 2009-02-06 01:25 /var/lib/texmf/ls-R
-rw-rw-r-- 1 root staff 79 2008-12-25 11:26 /usr/local/share/texmf/ls-R
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 29 2008-12-23 18:28 /usr/share/texmf/ls-R -> /var/lib/texmf/ls-R-TEXMFMAIN
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 27 2009-01-18 11:12 /usr/share/texmf-texlive/ls-R -> /var/lib/texmf/ls-R-TEXLIVE
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 27 2009-01-18 11:12 /usr/share/texmf-texlive/ls-R -> /var/lib/texmf/ls-R-TEXLIVE
######################################
Config files
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 20 2008-12-23 18:28 /usr/share/texmf/web2c/texmf.cnf -> /etc/texmf/texmf.cnf
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 6358 2009-02-06 01:25 /var/lib/texmf/web2c/fmtutil.cnf
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 8393 2009-02-06 01:25 /var/lib/texmf/web2c/updmap.cfg
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 6397 2009-02-06 01:25 /var/lib/texmf/tex/generic/config/language.dat
######################################
Files in /etc/texmf/web2c/
total 4
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 283 2007-06-20 17:33 mktex.cnf
######################################
md5sums of texmf.d
42c20d7e8bd343542772b5a145bf8ad8 /etc/texmf/texmf.d/05TeXMF.cnf
5f7f6652cc8b8071c9e4ea6ba9e9f0a1 /etc/texmf/texmf.d/15Plain.cnf
f68e5add6afd6585b982f2f78e2e6a92 /etc/texmf/texmf.d/45TeXinputs.cnf
ea33127256c6a9f37145ae5b16fdb80c /etc/texmf/texmf.d/55Fonts.cnf
afccf1d3f87057411166a77c58e00bd1 /etc/texmf/texmf.d/65BibTeX.cnf
9da7c1c7b1eaf06f941af91f48a23068 /etc/texmf/texmf.d/75DviPS.cnf
7ae52efac46feb97010986e57877d12e /etc/texmf/texmf.d/80DVIPDFMx.cnf
055e06548bac99958d8ab2dd1248f2b4 /etc/texmf/texmf.d/80tex4ht.cnf
37329819f1109e8a457e64b8b58fecdb /etc/texmf/texmf.d/85Misc.cnf
a8952d594677235951d447665ec46e9c /etc/texmf/texmf.d/90TeXDoc.cnf
30f4f13357c2761ed01a6a15f28725a5 /etc/texmf/texmf.d/95NonPath.cnf
1df66bc319cec731e202eaf39f5d85e1 /etc/texmf/texmf.d/96JadeTeX.cnf
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 5.0
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.25-2-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Versions of packages texlive-pstricks depends on:
ii tex-common 1.11.3 common infrastructure for building
ii texlive-base 2007.dfsg.1-5 TeX Live: Essential programs and f
ii texlive-common 2007.dfsg.1-5 TeX Live: Base component
ii texlive-generic-recommende 2007.dfsg.1-5 TeX Live: Miscellaneous generic ma
Versions of packages texlive-pstricks recommends:
ii ps2eps 1.64-5 convert PostScript to EPS (Encapsu
ii texlive-extra-utils 2007.dfsg.2-4 TeX Live: TeX auxiliary programs
ii texlive-pstricks-doc 2007.dfsg.15-1 TeX Live: Documentation files for
texlive-pstricks suggests no packages.
Versions of packages tex-common depends on:
ii debconf 1.5.24 Debian configuration management sy
ii ucf 3.0016 Update Configuration File: preserv
Versions of packages texlive-pstricks is related to:
ii tetex-base 2007.dfsg.1-5 TeX Live: teTeX transitional packa
ii tetex-bin 2007.dfsg.1-5 TeX Live: teTeX transitional packa
pn tetex-extra <none> (no description available)
ii tex-common 1.11.3 common infrastructure for building
-- debconf information:
tex-common/check_texmf_wrong:
tex-common/check_texmf_missing:
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 23:41, Norbert Preining <preining@logic.at> wrote:
> On Fr, 20 Feb 2009, Sandro Tosi wrote:
>> Is this working even for the first installation?
>
> Yes. You can configure that in /etc/apt/, and you can in aptitude even
> if the packages have been auto-selected still disable (press the _ key)
> before starting installation (pressing the y).
>
> And on the cmd line with --without-recommends.
>
> So yes, it works on first-time installations, too.
avoiding the installation of all recommends. That might not be what I
want (remove big packages I don't need while leaving other recommends
be installed).
>> needed to use the tex code (even if I recognize that upstream and you
>> packagers prefers this way), and for them any Mb not downloaded for
>
> It is not necessarily a case of "prefer" but of "license" ...
Mh, not one of the most "illuminate" one, I'd say.
Anyhow, give that's a "legal" matter, I see no point in keep replying,
hence closing this bug.
Thanks,
--
Sandro Tosi (aka morph, morpheus, matrixhasu)
My website: http://matrixhasu.altervista.org/
Me at Debian: http://wiki.debian.org/SandroTosi
--- End Message ---
Reply to: