Bug#487149: texlive-doc-en: Source missing for some documentation files
Norbert Preining <preining@logic.at> wrote:
> Ok, I have checked out the revision. There is only a small problem here
> that leads me to believe removing the catalogue might be the better
> option (it is anyway removed upstream from texlive AFAIR)
Ah, I didn't know that. More work for texdoc.tlu - while I hate being
shown the Catalogue page if the package documenation has a generic name
like "manual.pdf", I think it *is* useful when there's nothing
available.
> The problem is that the gencat.py script in src is actually GPL, but the
> used tcutils.py only contains
> # (C) COPYRIGHT
> # Togaware 2004 All rights are reserved.
> #
> # Authors: Graham Williams
> which is not really optimal.
[...]
> Should we ask Graham to fix that and give us a statement, or just remove
> the Catalogue???
Well, I'm always for "ask first, drop later". But if there was some
upstream discussion which lead to its removal, I don't think we should
keep it (since it would mean we have to take care for new upstream
versions etc.).
Regards, Frank
--
Frank Küster
Debian Developer (teTeX/TeXLive)
Reply to: