Bug#363061: marked as done (Contains non-free runtime files)
Your message dated Fri, 13 Jun 2008 22:19:56 +0200
with message-id <873anh9jf7.fsf@riesling.zuerich.kuesterei.ch>
and subject line #RC_bugs--: This is fixed or handled elsewhere
has caused the Debian Bug report #363061,
regarding Contains non-free runtime files
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
363061: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=363061
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
- To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
- Subject: tetex-extra: palatcm.sty is non-free
- From: Frank Küster <frank@debian.org>
- Date: Fri, 14 Apr 2006 15:14:03 +0200
- Message-id: <86k69scnac.fsf@alhambra.kuesterei.ch>
Package: tetex-extra
Version: 3.0-16bpo1
Severity: serious
palatcm.sty contains a license statement that requires renaming, which
is okay according to DFSG #4:
,----
| %%% Copyright (C) 1994 Aloysius G. Helminck. All rights reserved.
| %%% Permission is granted to to customize the declarations in this
| %%% file to serve the needs of your installation. However, no permission
| %%% is granted to distribute a modified version of this file under
| %%% its original name.
`----
But it doesn't even allow use - don't know whether this is implicitly
granted?
The fd files in the same directory don't have any copyright or license
statement at all; don't know whether they need one.
And I don't know whether this package is still useful today at all...
Regards, Frank
--
Frank Küster
Single Molecule Spectroscopy, Protein Folding @ Inst. f. Biochemie, Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer (teTeX)
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Hi,
as outlined in http://wiki.debian.org/AccumulativeLicensingBugs,
everything discussed in this bug has either been solved or handled in
separate bugs.
By the way, Hilmar, since you seem to do some valuable cleanup work
these days - any interest in resuming your work on
http://bugs.debian.org/327741 ?
Regards, Frank
--
Frank Küster
Debian Developer (teTeX/TeXLive)
--- End Message ---
Reply to: