[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#168081: marked as done (jadetex: "fancyhdr's E option without twoside option is useless")

Your message dated Wed, 11 Jun 2008 17:21:58 +0200
with message-id <20080611152158.GA3984@PC23>
and subject line Re: jadetex: "fancyhdr's E option without twoside option is useless"
has caused the Debian Bug report #168081,
regarding jadetex: "fancyhdr's E option without twoside option is useless"
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
168081: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=168081
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: jadetex
Version: 3.12-2
Severity: normal

Use of `if-first-page' and/or `if-front-page' functions causes warnings
like these to appear:

/--------
| Package Fancyhdr Warning: fancyhdr's E option without twoside option is useless
|  on input line 54.
| 
| 
| Package Fancyhdr Warning: fancyhdr's E option without twoside option is useless
|  on input line 71.
| 
| 
| Package Fancyhdr Warning: \footskip is too small (12.0pt): 
|  Make it at least 8.39996pt.
|  We now make it that large for the rest of the document.
|  This may cause the page layout to be inconsistent, however.
\--------


-- System Information
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Kernel Version: Linux suilven 2.4.19 #1 Thu Aug 15 14:26:00 BST 2002 i686 Pentium III (Coppermine) GenuineIntel GNU/Linux

Versions of the packages jadetex depends on:
ii  debianutils    1.16.7         Miscellaneous utilities specific to Debian
ii  openjade       1.4devel1-8    Implementation of the DSSSL language
ii  tetex-bin      1.0.7+20011202 teTeX binary files
ii  tetex-extra    1.0.2+20011202 extra teTeX library files
jade	Not installed or no info

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
Version: 3.13-9

On 06.11.02 Toby Speight (streapadair@gmx.net) wrote:

> Package: jadetex
> Version: 3.12-2
> Severity: normal
> 
> Use of `if-first-page' and/or `if-front-page' functions causes
> warnings like these to appear:
> 
According to the submitter in the latest versions the messages do not
appear and jadetex behaves as expected. -> Closing
It could have been a bug in the fancyhdr package, but I don't care...

H.
-- 
sigmentation fault

--- End Message ---
Reply to: