Bug#168081: jadetex: "fancyhdr's E option without twoside option is useless"

To: Hilmar Preusse <hille42@web.de>
Cc: 168081@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Bug#168081: jadetex: "fancyhdr's E option without twoside option is useless"
From: Toby Speight <T.M.Speight.90@cantab.net>
Date: Thu, 29 May 2008 18:57:49 +0100
Message-id: <[🔎] s8zlq9j8ma.fsf@canisp.eng.citrite.net>
Reply-to: Toby Speight <T.M.Speight.90@cantab.net>, 168081@bugs.debian.org
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20080509120357.GA4360@PC23> (Hilmar Preusse's message of "Fri, 9 May 2008 14:03:57 +0200")
References: <s8wunqjztk.fsf@suilven.cam.eu.citrix.com> <[🔎] 20080509120357.GA4360@PC23>

0> In article <[🔎] 20080509120357.GA4360@PC23>,
0> Hilmar Preusse <URL:mailto:hille42@web.de> ("Hilmar") wrote:

Hilmar> Would you be so kind to test if the problem still occurs?

Sorry it's taken me so long to get around to this!

I've just tested, and I don't see that message any more.  So this one
can probably be closed.

Thanks for your patience.  :-)

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Bug#168081: jadetex: "fancyhdr's E option without twoside option is useless"
  - From: Hilmar Preusse <hille42@web.de>

References:
- Bug#168081: jadetex: "fancyhdr's E option without twoside option is useless"
  - From: Hilmar Preusse <hille42@web.de>

Prev by Date: Re: luatex_0.25.3-2_i386.changes ACCEPTED
Next by Date: Bug#168081: jadetex: "fancyhdr's E option without twoside option is useless"
Previous by thread: Bug#168081: jadetex: "fancyhdr's E option without twoside option is useless"
Next by thread: Bug#168081: jadetex: "fancyhdr's E option without twoside option is useless"
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread