Re: Bug#419235: Do you want to keep on maintaining pbox-tex?

[Lucas Nussbaum <lucas@lucas-nussbaum.net>]

severity 419235 normal
reassign 419235 ftp.debian.org
retitle 419235 RM: circ-tex -- RoQA; obsoleted by texlive-latex-extra
thanks

On 28/08/07 at 12:03 +0200, Danai SAE-HAN (韓達耐) wrote:
> On 27-08-07 22:08, Frank Küster wrote:
> > 
> > The first problem is described in the bug.  The second is that pbox-tex
> > (which should be named latex-pbox, by the way) is already part of
> > texlive.
> 
> I see now that circ.sty from circ-tex is now also part of texlive-latex-extra.
> If Simon decides to package circ-tex separately, then I would propose the same
> patch as in #419239.

Hi,

I was looking at RC bugs #419239 and #419235.
The files in circ-tex seems to be in texlive-latex-extra{,-doc} now, so
it should be safe to remove it from unstable (and I'm requesting that
now). But pbox-tex includes some documentation:
/usr/share/doc/pbox-tex/pbox.dvi.gz
/usr/share/doc/pbox-tex/pbox.pdf.gz
/usr/share/doc/texmf/latex/pbox/pbox.dvi.gz
/usr/share/doc/texmf/latex/pbox/pbox.pdf.gz

Those files aren't in texlive-latex-extra-doc. Is that on purpose?

Simon, it would be great if you could clarify this.
 
Thank you,
-- 
| Lucas Nussbaum
| lucas@lucas-nussbaum.net   http://www.lucas-nussbaum.net/ |
| jabber: lucas@nussbaum.fr             GPG: 1024D/023B3F4F |