[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#429314: marked as done (texlive-context: missing dependency on lmodern)



Your message dated Fri, 16 Nov 2007 10:15:04 +0100
with message-id <20071116091504.GA6004@PC23>
and subject line Bug#429314: texlive-context: missing dependency on lmodern
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--- Begin Message ---
Package: texlive-context
Version: 2005.dfsg.3-1
Severity: important

This minimal test.tex ConTeXt example fails when run with
'texexec --pdf test.tex' (in Debian 'etch'):

  \starttext
  \input tufte
  \stoptext

Here is the first error (the remainder are similar):

  kpathsea: Running mktextfm ec-lmr12
  mktextfm: Running mf-nowin -progname=mf \mode:=ljfour; mag:=1; nonstopmode; input ec-lmr12
  This is METAFONT, Version 2.71828 (Web2C 7.5.5)

  kpathsea: Running mktexmf ec-lmr12
  ! I can't find file `ec-lmr12'.
  <*> ...ljfour; mag:=1; nonstopmode; input ec-lmr12

Installing 'lmodern' fixes the errors, because it provides those
missing tfm files.  So texlive-context should depend on lmodern, not
merely recommend lmodern.  Without lmodern, I think the package is
totally unusable.

My only worry about this bug report -- and the reason that I did not
mark it 'severe' -- is that it is /such/ a severe bug.  So I wonder
why I (or others) never noticed it before.  Did something change that
made lmodern required all of a sudden?  Or am I not understanding
something?

This machine runs Ubuntu feisty (i686), but I ran the above tests in a
pbuilder Debian 'etch' chroot.  I did 'sudo pbuilder login' (I think
it already had the etch security updates), then 'apt-get install
texlive-context'.  Then I ran that test file, found that it failed,
did 'apt-get install lmodern', and reran it with success.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 4.0
  APT prefers stable
  APT policy: (500, 'stable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.20-16-generic
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968) (ignored: LC_ALL set to C)

Versions of packages texlive-context depends on:
ii  libxml-parser-perl        2.34-4.2       Perl module for parsing XML files
ii  perl-tk                   1:804.027-7    Perl module providing the Tk graph
ii  texlive-base              2005.dfsg.3-1  TeX Live: Essential programs and f
ii  texlive-common            2005.dfsg.3-1  TeX Live: Base component
ii  texlive-metapost          2005.dfsg.2-12 TeX Live: MetaPost (and Metafont) 
ii  texlive-pdfetex           2005.dfsg.2-12 TeX Live: pdfTeX

texlive-context recommends no packages.

Versions of packages tex-common depends on:
ii  debconf [debconf-2.0]         1.5.11     Debian configuration management sy
ii  ucf                           2.0020     Update Configuration File: preserv

Versions of packages texlive-context is related to:
pn  tetex-base                    <none>     (no description available)
pn  tetex-bin                     <none>     (no description available)
pn  tetex-extra                   <none>     (no description available)

-- debconf information:
  tex-common/check_texmf_missing:
  tex-common/check_texmf_wrong:


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On 17.06.07 Sanjoy Mahajan (sanjoy@mrao.cam.ac.uk) wrote:

Hi,

> Package: texlive-context
> Version: 2005.dfsg.3-1
> Severity: important
> 
Actually texlive-context is a virtual package pulling in context.

root@kloetzer:~ # dpkg -l context
Desired=Unknown/Install/Remove/Purge/Hold
| Status=Not/Installed/Config-files/Unpacked/Failed-config/Half-installed
|/ Err?=(none)/Hold/Reinst-required/X=both-problems (Status,Err: uppercase=bad)
||/ Name           Version        Description
+++-==============-==============-============================================
ii  context        2007.09.28-1   powerful TeX format

context (2007.02.20-1) UNRELEASED; urgency=low

  * depend on lmodern >= 1.01 (currently only in experimental)

 -- Norbert Preining <preining@debian.org>  Sun, 25 Feb 2007 18:34:38 +0100

Closing the bug at this point.
-- 
sigmentation fault


--- End Message ---

Reply to: