Bug#447081: Found bug solution proposed
Le vendredi 19 octobre 2007, Norbert Preining a écrit :
> Dear Kohda-san,
>
> On Fr, 19 Okt 2007, Atsuhito Kohda wrote:
> > Where comes a difference with hps.pro? (it is in Bastien's
> > message but not in Norbert's)
>
> Thanks for spotting this.
>
> Bastien, can you confirm the crash WITHOUT the hps.pro, otherwise we
> cannot investigate further.
Confirm without /home/bastien.../hps.pro (a simple copy for testing)
sh-3.1$ dvips -z test.dvi
This is dvips(k) 5.96.1 Copyright 2007 Radical Eye Software
(www.radicaleye.com)
' TeX output 2007.10.18:1824' -> test.ps
</usr/share/texmf-texlive/dvips/base/tex.pro>
</usr/share/texmf-texlive/dvips/base/texps.pro>
</usr/share/texmf-texlive/dvips/base/special.pro>
</usr/share/texmf-texlive/dvips/base/hps.pro>.
</usr/share/texmf-texlive/fonts/type1/bluesky/cm/cmr10.pfb>[1Erreur de
segmentation
I am quite sure that it is a bufferoverflow. I have modified hpc.c (by hand)
but it refuse to compile due to a "conflict with debian patch system", will
retry today.
Regards.
Bastien
> Best wishes
>
> Norbert
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
>---- Dr. Norbert Preining <preining@logic.at> Vienna University of
> Technology Debian Developer <preining@debian.org>
> Debian TeX Group gpg DSA: 0x09C5B094 fp: 14DF 2E6C 0307 BE6D AD76
> A9C0 D2BF 4AA3 09C5 B094
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
>---- VIRGINSTOW (n.)
> A Durex machine which doesn't have the phrase 'So was the Titanic'
> scrawled on it. The word has now fallen into disuse.
> --- Douglas Adams, The Meaning of Liff
--
"ROUCARIES Bastien"
bastien.roucaries@enseeiht.fr
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ainsi, les mises à jour de MultideskOS ne changeront RIEN ! Le nouveau
système tournera mieux, sera plus rapide, plus stable, comportera plus
de commandes, mais sera exactement le même qu'avant la mise à jour.
-- Jayce - Tout est dans le rien, et réciproquement. --
Reply to: