[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Bug#402118 closed by Osamu Aoki <osamu@debian.org> (Bug#402118: fixed in debiandoc-sgml 1.1.102)



reopen 402118
found 402118 1.1.202

owner@bugs.debian.org (Debian Bug Tracking System) wrote:

> This is an automatic notification regarding your Bug report
> #402118: debiandoc-sgml: Must specifiy explicit TeXLive dependencies,
[...]
>  debiandoc-sgml (1.1.102) unstable; urgency=low
>  .
>    * Update Recommends: to use texlive-full. (closes: #402118)

No, PLEASE not that way!  I'm just about leaving for VAC, so I can't
argue in detail here.  But no package should ever Depend or Recommend
texlive-full.  Never.  Its HUGE.  Furthermore, it contains lots of
things which a document generated by debiandoc-sgml will never need.

Regards, Frank
-- 
Frank Küster
Single Molecule Spectroscopy, Protein Folding @ Inst. f. Biochemie, Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer (teTeX/TeXLive)



Reply to: