[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#433137: texlive-fonts-recommended: No license information for utopia and fpl



Package: texlive-fonts-recommended
Version: 2007-9
Severity: normal

Hi everybody,

I haven't cheked all parts of tl-fonts-recommended, but at least for
utopia and fpl there is no license information like the README files
that can be found on CTAN. For fpl one might argue that 

% fpl: gpl (verification data:1.002:1.002:2006-05-04:frank:README)
[list of files]

in Licenses.gz[1] is sufficient (I am not sure, though). But for
utopia one will need the actual license text, since it is nonstandard.

cheerio
ralf

[1] This file points people to the no longer active
pkg-texlive-maint@l.a.d.o. 

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 4.0
  APT prefers stable
  APT policy: (500, 'stable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.18-4-686
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)

Versions of packages texlive-fonts-recommended depends on:
ii  texlive-base                  2007-9     TeX Live: Essential programs and f
ii  texlive-common                2007-9     TeX Live: Base component

Versions of packages texlive-fonts-recommended recommends:
pn  tipa                          <none>     (no description available)

Versions of packages tex-common depends on:
ii  debconf                       1.5.11     Debian configuration management sy
ii  ucf                           2.0020     Update Configuration File: preserv

Versions of packages texlive-fonts-recommended is related to:
pn  tetex-base                    <none>     (no description available)
pn  tetex-bin                     <none>     (no description available)
pn  tetex-extra                   <none>     (no description available)
ii  tex-common                    1.7        Common infrastructure for using an

-- debconf information:
  tex-common/check_texmf_wrong:
  tex-common/check_texmf_missing:



Reply to: