Re: fiaif: FTBFS: I can't find file `ecrm1095'.
user debian-tex-maint@lists.debian.org
usertags 421919 builddep-tetex-ftbfs
thanks
Lucas Nussbaum <lucas@lucas-nussbaum.net> wrote:
> Relevant parts:
> (/usr/share/texmf-texlive/tex/latex/base/fontenc.sty
> (/usr/share/texmf-texlive/tex/latex/base/t1enc.def)kpathsea: Running mktextfm ecrm1095
> mktextfm: Running mf-nowin -progname=mf \mode:=ljfour; mag:=1; nonstopmode; input ecrm1095
> This is METAFONT, Version 2.71828 (Web2C 7.5.6)
> kpathsea: Running mktexmf ecrm1095
>
> ! I can't find file `ecrm1095'.
That's an interesting one: It used only texlive-latex-base as
Build-Dep. It's already fixed by adding tl-latex-recommended, I hope it
works this time.
(Hint: This wouldn't have happened if all packages uploaded to the
archive were built in clean chroots...)
I wonder whether we should think of gathering information about a
potential "texlive-builddep" package. While there are reasons that
collection-latexbase does not contain the EC fonts, most packages that
build-depend on TeX will need them, and there might be similar cases.
Or we just suggest maintainers to start with texlive-latex-recommended
instead of -base? Or we make clean-chroot-builds mandatory?
Regards, Frank
--
Dr. Frank Küster
Single Molecule Spectroscopy, Protein Folding @ Inst. f. Biochemie, Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer (teTeX/TeXLive)
Reply to: