Re: RC bugs of packages that Depend on tetex-base
Atsuhito Kohda <kohda@pm.tokushima-u.ac.jp> wrote:
> I already fixed a package but it is in experimental yet.
> It was very near releasing etch when I adopted the package
> so I didn't upload the fixed package in unstable.
>
> Further, the upstream says that 1.0.6 (vesion of unstable package)
> should be packaged but not 1.0.6.9 (version of experimental package),
> i.e. version with three (or two) digits is good for packaging but
> version with four digits is not good for packaging so I'm just
> wondering how to do. Anyway I can upload the fixed TeXmacs at any
> time. Thanks for your notification.
If you think the texmacs in experimental isn't fit for unstable, then I
suggest that you upload 1:1.0.6-12 to unstable, with the only change
being that it does not depend on tetex-base, and apply the "real" patch
to the experimental version.
This will make it installable in unstable, while you can continue
playing with 1.0.6.9 in experimental. Will it soon become 1.0.7?
Regards, Frank
--
Dr. Frank Küster
Single Molecule Spectroscopy, Protein Folding @ Inst. f. Biochemie, Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer (teTeX/TeXLive)
Reply to: