Hi, On Tue, Apr 10, 2007 at 06:00:06PM +0200, Frank Küster wrote: > severity 402118 important # might even get RC > retitle 402118 debiandoc-sgml: Must specifiy explicit TeXLive dependencies > thanks > > Dear debiandoc people, > > Norbert Preining <preining@logic.at> wrote: > > > Hmm, I would say upload to unstable now. I am running 2007 since quite > > some time without any big problems. And some(?) others, too. So I guess > > that an upload to unstable NOW would not create *emergency* problems. > > > > Furthermore, we *COULD* do the following (I believe!): > > - upload 2007-2 to unstable > > This means that tetex-extra and tetex-bin will become transitional > packages, provided by the texlive-base source package and depending on a > decent set of texlive packages. We hope that debiandoc-sgml will still > work for all languages, but it should rather be tested. Ack. But this is messy task which I do not think I have time to do everything. I am inclined to upload new package with simple Dep. change but it may violate new testing policy. Maybe I should do experimental. Does any one volunteer testing it? If not, I ave no other choice. Time is right for me being a bit reckless on uploading to testing but I need some push from people involved. > This is soon going to be announced on d-d-a, but we wanted to give you a > warning in advance. I think I need to upload a new version soonish :-) At the same time, I am looking for competent and eager maintainer for debiandoc-sgml. I am not asking much since I am asking someone with a bit better technical skill than me. My maintanance of this was mostly by my social skill. UTF-8 compatibility design impilimitation while maintaining old behavior is big TODO. I have accepted some UTF-8 data which I regret. If anyone is interested, please let me know. Osamu
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature