[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: kimwitu++: FTBFS: Cannot find ngerman.sty



Frank Küster <frank@kuesterei.ch> wrote:

> -Build-Depends-Indep: xsltproc, docbook-xml, docbook-xsl, transfig, gs, texlive
> +Build-Depends-Indep: xsltproc, docbook-xml, docbook-xsl, transfig, gs, texlive, texlive-latex-extra, texlive-lang-german

This works, but it's suboptimal.  The texlive meta package is meant for
users to get a "decent" selection of packages, but a package maintainer
should really check which are actually needed, in particular in
Build-Depends. 

texlive-latex-base, texlive-latex-recommended, texlive-fonts-recommended, texlive-latex-extra, texlive-lang-german

are actually needed.  So a correcter patch would be

diff -Nur kimwitu++-2.3.10.old/debian/changelog kimwitu++-2.3.10/debian/changelog
--- kimwitu++-2.3.10.old/debian/changelog	2007-02-05 22:01:41.000000000 +0100
+++ kimwitu++-2.3.10/debian/changelog	2007-02-05 22:02:36.000000000 +0100
@@ -1,3 +1,9 @@
+kimwitu++ (2.3.10-2~1) unstable; urgency=low
+
+  * Add the necessary explicit texlive build-dependencies
+
+ -- Frank Küster <frank@debian.org>  Mon,  5 Feb 2007 22:02:36 +0100
+
 kimwitu++ (2.3.10-1) unstable; urgency=low
 
   * New upstream version.
diff -Nur kimwitu++-2.3.10.old/debian/control kimwitu++-2.3.10/debian/control
--- kimwitu++-2.3.10.old/debian/control	2007-02-05 22:01:41.000000000 +0100
+++ kimwitu++-2.3.10/debian/control	2007-02-05 22:02:12.000000000 +0100
@@ -4,7 +4,7 @@
 Maintainer: Michael Piefel <piefel@debian.org>
 Standards-Version: 3.7.2
 Build-Depends: debhelper (>= 5.0.0)
-Build-Depends-Indep: xsltproc, docbook-xml, docbook-xsl, transfig, gs, texlive
+Build-Depends-Indep: xsltproc, docbook-xml, docbook-xsl, transfig, gs, texlive-latex-base, texlive-latex-recommended, texlive-fonts-recommended, texlive-latex-extra, texlive-lang-german
 
 Package: kimwitu++
 Section: devel


-- 
Dr. Frank Küster
Single Molecule Spectroscopy, Protein Folding @ Inst. f. Biochemie, Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer (teTeX/TeXLive)



Reply to: