Re: Problems with texlive-new's tpm2debcommon.pm
On Fre, 19 Jan 2007, Frank Küster wrote:
> if you move tpm.data out of the way, the script will just do nothing
> (happily), because Tpm::TexmfTreeOfType is not defined. After taking
Ahhh, now I know why I shouldn't have deleted it in the first place ...
> the definition from texlive(old)'s Tpm.pm, it turns out that the new->
> Method is missing, and this I cannot fix without reading about OO stuff
> in the Perl documentation.
Haeehhh... take a look at the tpm2deb.pl script in the (old) texlive
dir, it should be quite easy to add.
I can do it probably on Monday, but I am on "home"-holiday with official
meetings, Ball, birthday parties etc etc.
> Maybe you've already run into this when trying to package 2007? Why did
> you make the branch? Would you mind me merging my changes onto the
> branch?
No, kill the branch, it was useless, you are right, we do it in
texlive-new direct for 2007...
Especially now that all the current texlive packages are also in sid AND
etch (after 3 days).
Kill the bransch (uups, branch)...
Best wishes
Norbert
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Dr. Norbert Preining <preining@logic.at> Università di Siena
Debian Developer <preining@debian.org> Debian TeX Group
gpg DSA: 0x09C5B094 fp: 14DF 2E6C 0307 BE6D AD76 A9C0 D2BF 4AA3 09C5 B094
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
NACTION (n.)
The 'n' with which cheap advertising copywriters replace the word
'and' (as in 'fish 'n' chips', 'mix 'n' match', 'assault 'n'
battery'), in the mistaken belief that this is in some way chummy or
endearing.
--- Douglas Adams, The Meaning of Liff
Reply to: