Processed: Re: Processed: do these still apply?

To: Martin Michlmayr <tbm@cyrius.com>
Cc: Debian TeX maintainers <debian-tex-maint@lists.debian.org>(tetex-base #189919), unknown-package@qa.debian.org (dvipdfm #189919)
Subject: Processed: Re: Processed: do these still apply?
From: owner@bugs.debian.org (Debian Bug Tracking System)
Date: Mon, 08 Jan 2007 10:48:11 -0800
Message-id: <[🔎] handler.s.C.116827930219758.transcript@bugs.debian.org>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20070108175405.GS13289@deprecation.cyrius.com>
References: <[🔎] 20070108175405.GS13289@deprecation.cyrius.com>

Processing commands for control@bugs.debian.org:

> reassign 189919 dvipdfm
Bug#189919: dvipdfm: remove script issue with dpkg-divert
Warning: Unknown package 'dvipdfm'
Bug reassigned from package `tetex-base' to `dvipdfm'.

> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

Reply to:

References:
- Re: Processed: do these still apply?
  - From: Martin Michlmayr <tbm@cyrius.com>

Prev by Date: SVN texlive (new) commit: r2233 - texlive-new/trunk/texlive-base/debian
Next by Date: Re: Bug#402118: debiandoc-sgml: Please allow alternative dependency on texlive
Previous by thread: Re: Processed: do these still apply?
Next by thread: Bug#405807: texlive-bibtex-extra: Please install apacite language support in usable location
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread