Re: NOT YET: Please unblock texlive-bin
On 02.01.07 Norbert Preining (preining@logic.at) wrote:
> On Die, 02 Jan 2007, Hilmar Preusse wrote:
Hi,
> > That was the easy part. What about #403267 (resp. the related bug
> > in teTeX bin): apply the mininal invasive patch from #291438
> > (err, the same bug is #403245 -- different patch, how nice).
>
> Yes I know, but isn't there some discussion about inclusion
> upstream or not, and that it seems not to be the right fix for now?
>
> How do we proceed here?
>
I posted a question to Martin into #403245. The patch in #291438 was
refused by Mark. About the one #403245 I don't now. I'd rather leave
dvipdfm unpatched and tell the users to use dvipdfmx...
H.
--
Oh, I've seen copies [of Linux Journal] around the terminal room at The Labs.
-- Dennis Ritchie
http://www.hilmar-preusse.de.vu/
Reply to: