[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Coordinating to let some TeX-related packages in: texlive-bin



Hi Andreas, hi Release Team!

On Don, 14 Dez 2006, Andreas Barth wrote:
> > On Die, 12 Dez 2006, Andreas Barth wrote:
> > > * Frank Küster (frank@debian.org) [061211 20:06]:
> > > > [..]
> > > 
> > > textlive-bin approved.
> > 
> > Thanks a lot, but it seems that you have set the unblock to the -6
> > version, which was buggy. Please see my last email about this.
> > The excuses give me:
> > 	Unblock request by aba ignored due to version mismatch: 2005.dfsg.2-6
> > Could you please change this to -7.
> 
> fixed.

There is something going on which I do not understand: the execuses page
texlive-bin tells me that it is waiting for libpng, but this one is in
freeze. And indeed, it has a dependency on libpng12-0 (>= 1.2.15~beta5).
But this dependency is somehow only theoretically as it was
autogenerated. 

But since I have to build the binary debs before upload in a sid
environment, what is the correct procedure now:
- Rebuild the texlive-bin based binary deps in a sarge environment, and
  reupload? But this will not work for other archs than the one I
  upload, as the autobuilders will use sid (I assume).
- ignore 
- ???

Thanks for any suggestion, if I have to do something to get this fixed.

Best wishes

Norbert

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Dr. Norbert Preining <preining@logic.at>                    Università di Siena
Debian Developer <preining@debian.org>                         Debian TeX Group
gpg DSA: 0x09C5B094      fp: 14DF 2E6C 0307 BE6D AD76  A9C0 D2BF 4AA3 09C5 B094
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
PEN-TRE-TAFARN-Y-FEDW (n.)
Welsh word which literally translates as
'leaking-biro-by-the-glass-hole-of-the-clerk-of-the-bank-has-been-
-taken-to-another-place-leaving-only-the-special-inkwell-and-three-
-inches-of-tin-chain'.
			--- Douglas Adams, The Meaning of Liff



Reply to: