New Debian context package based on context release 061207
Hi all!
I have created a new context package 2006.12.07-0.1 for Debian and would
like to hear your comments and test. No big changes:
* new upstream
* suggest fontforge, and let texfont call fontforge instead of pfaedit
* add dpatch build-dep and adjust rules
As usual available from
deb(-src) http://www.tug.org/texlive/Debian/ context/
There seem to be some deep changes in the upstream packaging, as various
map files are now missing from the cont-tmf.zip file. The debdiff
between the old and the new packages gives me:
Files in second .deb but not in first
-------------------------------------
/usr/share/texmf/fonts/enc/dvips/context/cmin.enc
/usr/share/texmf/fonts/enc/dvips/context/cmit.enc
/usr/share/texmf/fonts/enc/dvips/context/cmitt.enc
/usr/share/texmf/fonts/enc/dvips/context/cmrm.enc
/usr/share/texmf/fonts/enc/dvips/context/cmsc.enc
/usr/share/texmf/fonts/enc/dvips/context/cmtt.enc
/usr/share/texmf/fonts/enc/dvips/context/teff-trinite.enc
/usr/share/texmf/fonts/enc/dvips/jmn/hans.enc
/usr/share/texmf/tex/context/base/cont-new.mkii
/usr/share/texmf/tex/context/base/core-blk.tex
/usr/share/texmf/tex/context/base/core-buf.mkii
/usr/share/texmf/tex/context/base/core-con.mkii
/usr/share/texmf/tex/context/base/core-ctx.tex
/usr/share/texmf/tex/context/base/core-lme.tex
/usr/share/texmf/tex/context/base/core-obj.mkii
/usr/share/texmf/tex/context/base/core-pos.mkii
/usr/share/texmf/tex/context/base/core-stg.tex
/usr/share/texmf/tex/context/base/core-sys.mkii
/usr/share/texmf/tex/context/base/core-trf.tex
/usr/share/texmf/tex/context/base/core-two.mkii
/usr/share/texmf/tex/context/base/core-two.tex
/usr/share/texmf/tex/context/base/core-uti.mkii
/usr/share/texmf/tex/context/base/core-ver.mkii
/usr/share/texmf/tex/context/base/enco-xtx.tex
/usr/share/texmf/tex/context/base/lang-mis.tex
/usr/share/texmf/tex/context/base/lang-sla.mkii
/usr/share/texmf/tex/context/base/meta-mis.tex
/usr/share/texmf/tex/context/base/meta-pdf.mkii
/usr/share/texmf/tex/context/base/mult-fst.tex
/usr/share/texmf/tex/context/base/regi-8859-1.tex
/usr/share/texmf/tex/context/base/regi-8859-10.tex
/usr/share/texmf/tex/context/base/regi-8859-13.tex
/usr/share/texmf/tex/context/base/regi-8859-15.tex
/usr/share/texmf/tex/context/base/regi-8859-16.tex
/usr/share/texmf/tex/context/base/regi-8859-2.tex
/usr/share/texmf/tex/context/base/regi-8859-3.tex
/usr/share/texmf/tex/context/base/regi-8859-4.tex
/usr/share/texmf/tex/context/base/regi-8859-5.tex
/usr/share/texmf/tex/context/base/regi-8859-7.tex
/usr/share/texmf/tex/context/base/regi-8859-9.tex
/usr/share/texmf/tex/context/base/regi-ini.mkii
/usr/share/texmf/tex/context/base/regi-run.mkii
/usr/share/texmf/tex/context/base/s-map-10.tex
/usr/share/texmf/tex/context/base/s-ptj-01.tex
/usr/share/texmf/tex/context/base/spec-def.mkii
/usr/share/texmf/tex/context/base/spec-fdf.mkii
/usr/share/texmf/tex/context/base/supp-fil.mkii
/usr/share/texmf/tex/context/base/syst-cat.mkii
/usr/share/texmf/tex/context/base/syst-cat.tex
/usr/share/texmf/tex/context/base/syst-chr.tex
/usr/share/texmf/tex/context/base/syst-con.mkii
/usr/share/texmf/tex/context/base/syst-fnt.tex
/usr/share/texmf/tex/context/base/syst-mtx.tex
/usr/share/texmf/tex/context/base/syst-pdt.tex
/usr/share/texmf/tex/context/base/syst-rtp.mkii
/usr/share/texmf/tex/context/base/syst-rtp.tex
/usr/share/texmf/tex/context/base/syst-str.mkii
/usr/share/texmf/tex/context/base/syst-str.tex
/usr/share/texmf/tex/context/base/thrd-pic.tex
/usr/share/texmf/tex/context/base/x-res-12.tex
/usr/share/texmf/tex/context/base/x-res-20.tex
/usr/bin/luatools
/usr/bin/mtxtools
Files in first .deb but not in second
-------------------------------------
/usr/share/texmf/fonts/enc/dvips/context/ec-sc.enc
/usr/share/texmf/fonts/enc/dvips/context/lm-texnansi-osfsc.enc
/usr/share/texmf/fonts/enc/dvips/context/texnansi-sc.enc
/usr/share/texmf/fonts/enc/dvips/lm/cmin.enc
/usr/share/texmf/fonts/enc/dvips/lm/cmit.enc
/usr/share/texmf/fonts/enc/dvips/lm/cmitt.enc
/usr/share/texmf/fonts/enc/dvips/lm/cmrm.enc
/usr/share/texmf/fonts/enc/dvips/lm/cmsc.enc
/usr/share/texmf/fonts/enc/dvips/lm/cmtt.enc
/usr/share/texmf/fonts/enc/dvips/lm/csin.enc
/usr/share/texmf/fonts/enc/dvips/lm/csrm.enc
/usr/share/texmf/fonts/enc/dvips/lm/cssc.enc
/usr/share/texmf/fonts/enc/dvips/lm/cstt.enc
/usr/share/texmf/fonts/enc/dvips/lm/ec-lm.enc
/usr/share/texmf/fonts/enc/dvips/lm/plin.enc
/usr/share/texmf/fonts/enc/dvips/lm/plit.enc
/usr/share/texmf/fonts/enc/dvips/lm/plitt.enc
/usr/share/texmf/fonts/enc/dvips/lm/plrm.enc
/usr/share/texmf/fonts/enc/dvips/lm/plsc.enc
/usr/share/texmf/fonts/enc/dvips/lm/pltt.enc
/usr/share/texmf/fonts/enc/dvips/lm/qx-lm.enc
/usr/share/texmf/fonts/enc/dvips/lm/qx-lmtt.enc
/usr/share/texmf/fonts/enc/dvips/lm/t5-lm.enc
/usr/share/texmf/fonts/enc/dvips/lm/texnansi-lm.enc
/usr/share/texmf/fonts/enc/dvips/lm/ts1-lm.enc
/usr/share/texmf/fonts/map/dvips/context/ec-lm.map
/usr/share/texmf/fonts/map/dvips/context/el-lm.map
/usr/share/texmf/fonts/map/dvips/context/qx-lm.map
/usr/share/texmf/fonts/map/dvips/context/t5-lm.map
/usr/share/texmf/fonts/map/dvips/context/texnansi-lm.map
/usr/share/texmf/fonts/map/dvips/context/ts1-lm.map
/usr/share/texmf/tex/context/base/font-map.tex
/usr/share/texmf/tex/context/base/regi-iso-8859-1.tex
/usr/share/texmf/tex/context/base/regi-iso-8859-15.tex
/usr/share/texmf/tex/context/base/regi-iso-8859-2.tex
/usr/share/texmf/tex/context/base/regi-iso-8859-7.tex
If someone can explain me the big changes? Something like: We don't need
the map files anymore or so would be nice.
Best wishes
Norbert
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Dr. Norbert Preining <preining@logic.at> Università di Siena
Debian Developer <preining@debian.org> Debian TeX Group
gpg DSA: 0x09C5B094 fp: 14DF 2E6C 0307 BE6D AD76 A9C0 D2BF 4AA3 09C5 B094
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
OSBASTON (n.)
A point made for the seventh time to somebody who insists that they
know exactly what you mean but clearly hasn't got the faintest idea.
--- Douglas Adams, The Meaning of Liff
Reply to: