[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Bug#402118: debiandoc-sgml: Please allow alternative dependency on texlive



Frank Küster <frank@debian.org> wrote:

> Package: debiandoc-sgml
> Version: 1.1.99
> Severity: normal
>
> debiandoc-sgml currently 
>
> Recommends: libpaperg, tetex-bin, tetex-extra, texinfo, latex-cjk-all, gs-esp | gs
>
> This should be changed to allow texlive to be used, too.  I'm not sure
> which texlive packages are needed, but I'll investigate this using
> debian-reference as an example.

The packages needed for debian-reference are

texlive-latex-extra texlive-latex-recommended texlive-fonts-recommended

So this could be

Recommends: libpaperg, tetex-bin | texlive-latex-recommended, \
                       tetex-extra | texlive-latex-extra, \
                       tetex-extra | texlive-fonts-recommended, \
                texinfo, latex-cjk-all, gs-esp | gs

BTW, are you aware that meanwhile gs-gpl and gs-afpl have a considerably
higher version number than gs-esp (8.5[43] compared to 8.15).  Are you
sure that gs-esp is still the preferred alternative?

Regards, Frank

-- 
Dr. Frank Küster
Single Molecule Spectroscopy, Protein Folding @ Inst. f. Biochemie, Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer (teTeX/TeXLive)



Reply to: