Frank Küster wrote: > "Kevin B. McCarty" <kmccarty@Princeton.EDU> wrote: >>One big help would be to include a URL to the TDS in the paragraph >>quoted above. I don't know if it's available in HTML format. Even if >>it isn't, a pointer would still be very helpful, for instance "The TDS >>is available in the texlive-doc-en package and the tetex-doc package; it >>may be viewed by running 'texdoc tds' if one of these packages is >>installed." > > I have now commited the following patch, which moves the TDS stuff to > the subsection about File searching instead of TEXMF trees. What do you > think about it? It looks great. I have one very minor nitpick: > + File locations must follow the TeX Directory Structure, TDS. > + The TDS specification is installed in > + the <package>texlive-doc-en</package> > + and <package>tetex-doc</package> packages > + as <file>tds.dvi</file>, I think it is actually installed as tds.dvi.gz. >>Alternatively you could consider shipping the TDS doc in tex-common >>instead of (or in addition to) texlive-doc-en/tetex-doc, say in the same >>directory as the Debian TeX policy docs. > > That's actually what we should do, just as debian-policy ships a copy of > the FHS. I just don't have time for this right now. No problem :-) > Should we recreate > the html/dvi files at package build time? I imagine this wasn't directed only at me, but IMHO: yes, why not? best regards, -- Kevin B. McCarty <kmccarty@princeton.edu> Physics Department WWW: http://www.princeton.edu/~kmccarty/ Princeton University GPG: public key ID 4F83C751 Princeton, NJ 08544
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature