Bug#397347: marked as done (tetex-bin: Font problem with the latest dvips)
Your message dated Tue, 07 Nov 2006 13:14:46 +0100
with message-id <86fycvlah5.fsf@alhambra.kuesterei.ch>
and subject line Bug#397347: tetex-bin: Font problem with the latest dvips
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--- Begin Message ---
Package: tetex-bin
Version: 3.0-23
Severity: normal
Since one of the last upgrades of tetex-bin, I get such errors when I convert dvi document to pdf:
dvips: Font ecrm2074 at 8000 not found; scaling 600 instead.
dvips: Such scaling will generate extremely poor output.
Altough the difference in font qualities is not too important, I would like to know if this is normal or if I am missing a package which provides the requested font.
Thanks for your help,
François Valenduc
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 4.0
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.18.2
Locale: LANG=fr_BE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_BE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) (ignored: LC_ALL set to fr_BE.UTF-8)
Versions of packages tetex-bin depends on:
ii debconf [debconf-2.0] 1.5.8 Debian configuration management sy
ii debianutils 2.17.3 Miscellaneous utilities specific t
ii dialog 1.0-20060221-1 Displays user-friendly dialog boxe
ii dpkg 1.13.24 package maintenance system for Deb
ii ed 0.2-20 The classic unix line editor
ii libc6 2.3.6.ds1-8 GNU C Library: Shared libraries
ii libfontconfig1 2.4.1-2 generic font configuration library
ii libfreetype6 2.2.1-5 FreeType 2 font engine, shared lib
ii libgcc1 1:4.1.1-19 GCC support library
ii libice6 1:1.0.1-2 X11 Inter-Client Exchange library
ii libjpeg62 6b-13 The Independent JPEG Group's JPEG
ii libkpathsea4 3.0-23 path search library for teTeX (run
ii libpaper1 1.1.20 Library for handling paper charact
ii libpng12-0 1.2.8rel-7 PNG library - runtime
ii libpoppler0c2 0.4.5-5 PDF rendering library
ii libsm6 1:1.0.1-3 X11 Session Management library
ii libstdc++6 4.1.1-19 The GNU Standard C++ Library v3
ii libt1-5 5.1.0-2 Type 1 font rasterizer library - r
ii libx11-6 2:1.0.3-2 X11 client-side library
ii libxaw7 1:1.0.2-4 X11 Athena Widget library
ii libxext6 1:1.0.1-2 X11 miscellaneous extension librar
ii libxmu6 1:1.0.2-2 X11 miscellaneous utility library
ii libxpm4 1:3.5.5-2 X11 pixmap library
ii libxt6 1:1.0.2-2 X11 toolkit intrinsics library
ii mime-support 3.37-1 MIME files 'mime.types' & 'mailcap
ii perl 5.8.8-6.1 Larry Wall's Practical Extraction
ii sed 4.1.5-1 The GNU sed stream editor
ii tetex-base 3.0.dfsg.3-1 Basic TeX input files of teTeX
ii tex-common 0.38 Common infrastructure for using an
ii ucf 2.0016 Update Configuration File: preserv
ii whiptail 0.52.2-8 Displays user-friendly dialog boxe
ii zlib1g 1:1.2.3-13 compression library - runtime
Versions of packages tetex-bin recommends:
pn libxml-parser-perl <none> (no description available)
pn perl-tk <none> (no description available)
ii psutils 1.17-23 A collection of PostScript documen
Versions of packages tetex-base depends on:
ii tex-common 0.38 Common infrastructure for using an
ii ucf 2.0016 Update Configuration File: preserv
Versions of packages tetex-extra depends on:
ii tetex-base 3.0.dfsg.3-1 Basic TeX input files of teTeX
ii ucf 2.0016 Update Configuration File: preserv
-- no debconf information
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Hilmar Preusse <hille42@web.de> wrote:
>> Maybe I always had the problem but with the latest version of dvips
>> included in the tetex-bin package, the error message was now
>> displayed and not before?
>>
> AFAICT we did not modify the dvips code (Frank?). So the error
> message should have been there before.
Not recently. I think the last relevant change was from 2.0.2 to 3.0,
there are no patches to dvips code in 3.0.
> Can we close that bug now?
I think so and am doing this with that mail. Thanks for caring!
Regards, Frank
--
Dr. Frank Küster
Single Molecule Spectroscopy, Protein Folding @ Inst. f. Biochemie, Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer (teTeX/TeXLive)
--- End Message ---
Reply to: