[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#396965: texlive-latex-extra: curve needs ltxtable to work



Package: texlive-latex-extra
Version: 2005.dfsg.2-2
Severity: normal
Hi,

Curve, which belongs to this package, can't work. It requires ltxtable.sty
(of David Carlisle). Since some contribs of D. Carlisle are in
texlive-latex-base, maybe it would be convenient to add ltxtable.sty
in that package ? Otherwise, it would be necessary, imho, to add it in
texlive-latex-extra.

Thanks,

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (990, 'testing')
Architecture: i386 (i586)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.4.27-2-k6
Locale: LANG=fr_FR@euro, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR@euro (charmap=ISO-8859-15)

Versions of packages texlive-latex-extra depends on:
ii  preview-latex-style        11.83-2.1     LaTeX style files for editor embed
ii  texlive-common             2005.dfsg.2-3 TeX Live: Base component
ii  texlive-latex-base         2005.dfsg.2-3 TeX Live: Basic LaTeX packages
ii  texlive-pictures           2005.dfsg.2-3 TeX Live: Drawing and graphing pac

Versions of packages texlive-latex-extra recommends:
ii  texlive-generic-extra      2005.dfsg.2-2 TeX Live: Miscellaneous extra gene
ii  texlive-latex-recommended  2005.dfsg.2-3 TeX Live: LaTeX recommended packag
ii  texpower                   0.2-2         Macros for creating professional p

Versions of packages tex-common depends on:
ii  debconf [debconf-2.0]         1.5.8      Debian configuration management sy
ii  ucf                           2.0015     Update Configuration File: preserv

Versions of packages texlive-latex-extra is related to:
pn  tetex-base                    <none>     (no description available)
pn  tetex-bin                     <none>     (no description available)
pn  tetex-extra                   <none>     (no description available)

-- debconf information:
  tex-common/singleuser: false
  tex-common/check_texmf_wrong:
  tex-common/check_texmf_missing:

-- 
Bernard Adrian 
http://www.bernadrian.net



Reply to: