Re: intent to do a poppler transition

[Ondřej Surý <ondrej@sury.org>]

Andreas Barth píše v Út 10. 10. 2006 v 08:34 +0200:
> Hi,
> 
> just to repeat: If you want to do the poppler transition, it is *your*
> task to check:
> 
> * Steve Langasek (vorlon@debian.org) [061005 21:22]:
> > > - In any case, shouldn't we carefully check all affected packages,
> > >   whether they FTBFS and whether they still work?  This would IMO
> > >   require a phase where all of them are in experimental, except poppler
> > >   itself in case it gets a new dev package name.
> > 
> > Yes, given the current release schedule, this new libpoppler transition will
> > only be considered for etch if someone does rebuild and test all the
> > reverse-dependencies, providing any necessary patches and documenting these
> > to the release team.
> 
> Given the current date, I don't expect the poppler transition to happen,
> unless that happens very fast. And even in that case, please speak with
> us before uploading the package to unstable.

Considering my work schedule atm, let's postpone this transition to etch
+1, so we have more time to do it right.

Ondrej.
-- 
Ondřej Surý <ondrej@sury.org>