Re: [urgent] update-fontlang new checks
Ralf Stubner <ralf.stubner@web.de> wrote:
> I am not sure this is the ideal place for this check, since it will only
> be made when TEXMFVAR points to a single directory. This is the most
> likely case, though, and if it is not the case, the user has to specify
> output_file directly. One could assume an 'expert user' in this case.
Good point.
> The "former ... later" construct might be a bit difficult for some
> people. Offhand I don't know a better way to say this, though.
While we're at it, isn't it rather "former... latter"?
> Of course, it would be cleaner to have common code for the various
> sanity checks. But that isn't implemented that easily.
<No time to look at that, sorry>
--
Florent
Reply to: