[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: intent to do a poppler transition



Moritz Muehlenhoff <jmm@inutil.org> wrote:
> On 2006-10-02, Norbert Preining <preining <at> logic.at> wrote:
>> On Mon, 02 Okt 2006, Ond??ej Surý wrote:
>>> poppler 0.5.4 (f.d.o PDF rendering library) was declared stable by
>>> upstream and I would like to upload new version to unstable which
>>> changes SONAME from 0 to 1.  No API changes were done between 0.4.x and
>>> 0.5.x so just rebuild with new libpoppler-dev should be enough.  Also
>>
>> I remember a patch in the bts that should make tetex/texlive ready for
>> poppler 0.5, the patch came from the ubuntu people which are shipping
>> 0.5.
>> (http://patches.ubuntu.com/t/texlive-bin/texlive-bin_2005.dfsg.1-1ubuntu2.patch)
> 
> *Sigh* Is this another embedded instance of the xpdf code?

What are you talking about?  It's another instance of a package using
libpoppler, as per the subject.

Regards, Frank

-- 
Frank Küster
Single Molecule Spectroscopy, Protein Folding @ Inst. f. Biochemie, Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer (teTeX/TeXLive)



Reply to: